Website: http://zanyhost.com
Whois
Datacenter Location
Spec and Features
System Information
Download and Upload From International Location
Location: US – Port Speed: 100Mbit (shared) – Method: SFTP-GET & PUT
Download and Upload From International Location
Location: UK – Port Speed: 100Mbit (shared) – Method: SFTP-GET & PUT
Disk I/O Test
Benchmark Test (I/O test disabled)
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Process Creation 1 2 3
2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: xxxxxxxxxxxx: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.028stab070.7 -- #1 SMP Fri Oct 1 14:17:1
4 MSD 2010
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3220 @ 2.40GHz (4788.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3220 @ 2.40GHz (4787.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
04:12:44 up 1:11, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.14, 0.07; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Mar 17 2011 04:12:44 - 04:40:09
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12046489.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2542.4 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3098.7 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 781492.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 226100.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9285.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4742.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 480.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 943.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 648026.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12046489.6 1032.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2542.4 462.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 3098.7 720.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 781492.8 628.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 226100.8 565.3
Process Creation 126.0 9285.5 736.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4742.3 1118.5
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 480.6 ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 943.8 1573.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 648026.4 432.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 742.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Mar 17 2011 04:40:09 - 05:07:25
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24218111.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4983.9 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4506.6 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1484889.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 452441.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13697.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6855.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 492.1 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 961.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1114869.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24218111.3 2075.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4983.9 906.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4506.6 1048.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1484889.9 1193.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 452441.4 1131.1
Process Creation 126.0 13697.7 1087.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6855.7 1616.9
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 492.1 ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 961.5 1602.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1114869.5 743.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 1210.3
Support Response
First Ticket Submitted at: February 20, 2011 – 16.31 (GMT +7)
Second Ticket Submitted at: February 20, 2011 – 16.59 (GMT +7)
Third Ticket Submitted at: February 20, 2011 – 11.16
Summary
Back to the nature with a review, it is now ZanyHost. As usual i got maxmind error when placed an order because my country is (probably) suspected as a fraud one. My first and second ticket was merged by sales department, i don’t know why, because usually in my previous hosts when i opened a ticket and ask the different questions, they’ll tell me to open a new ticket, but it’s okay, i don’t have any problem with this. But the second ticket seems to be a little late for respond, more than 6 hours for my question about OS(es) in SolusVM that don’t up to date. They told that they would update the OS (especially CentOS – my request) but it is not updated until now, but again it’s not a problem for me because i didn’t take it for serious purpose and i can still update it with yum even it took more time than updating CentOS 5.5. About the speed they’re good, especially from UK, and when i checked the datacenter location of the IP address it shows UK location whereas only Atlanta and Chicago location on their website. For the uptime i don’t have any problem, they have a good network. Anyway i played a little bit rough with their X3320 Xeon, even it is not an enterprise class for selling VPS(es) but as long as they put the right portion for each VPS(es), it will be good. So far i’m quite satisfied with their VPS, with a real budget price but reliable, 7.5 points for ZanyHost.