Website: http://123systems.net
Whois
Datacenter Whois
Spec and Features
System Information
Download and Upload From International Location
Location: US – Port Speed: 1Gbit – Method: WGET & cURL
Disk I/O Test
Benchmark Test (I/O test disabled)
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: server.rapidsharepremiumaccounts.org: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5.028stab081.1 -- #1 SMP Thu Dec 23 20:17: 23 MSK 2010 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz (4000.1 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 09:30:41 up 34 min, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.12, 0.25; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 12 2011 09:30:41 - 09:55:13 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10931792.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2188.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2180.1 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 780939.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 212174.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6108.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2445.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 162.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 335.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 703926.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10931792.2 936.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2188.2 397.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 2180.1 507.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 780939.9 627.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 212174.5 530.4 Process Creation 126.0 6108.9 484.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2445.0 576.7 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 162.0 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 335.9 559.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 703926.5 469.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 550.2
Summary
123Systems, one of (probably) budget vps provider in the web hosting world. I was trying to use this vps as a repo mirror for my NginX Auto Installer, but then decide not to use it because of their network and disk I/O is very far from my expectation. It is hard for me to even do yum update, network was very slow, i got almost under 1MB/sec for downloading files to the box. And about I/O, take a look at the result, 12MB/sec – 18MB/sec – 23MB/sec, that makes data reading and / or transferring became so slow, not even good for development. But there’s still one good thing about them, their support response’s good, always respond to my queries in under half an hour, that’s a plus point. So 7 points from 10 points will be given to 123Systems from my personal rating.
This is my experience with 123Systems: http://gridalo.blogspot.com/2011/06/123systemsnet-my-experience.html
123systms totally suck, vps downtime happends all the time, support team seems to me is a one man team, p1 ticket always get closed without any update! DON’T WASTE YOUR MONEY ON TIME!!
I used to be with 123Systems, around a year ago, and they were ok. These days, not so much. I bought a VPS, and an upgrade for that VPS a few days later. I paid for this upgrade. As of writing this review, it is over a month later, and I have not received this upgrade. All 5 of my tickets have been ignored, and all other attempts to contact them have also been ignored. I am not the only one with this problem, as I can see from Twitter. STAY AWAY.
Hi robin,
Thank you for your review, i’m sorry you have bad experience with them, hope you’ll find a good provider in the future.